| |
|
1 | 2 | 3
| |
|
COLUMBIA
FORUM
With the Brain Trust in Egypt
When
Jacques Barzun `27, the nonagenarian University professor
emeritus and one of America’s most important cultural historians,
suggested that our fin de siècle was an age of decadence,
everyone from The New York Review of Books to Charlie
Rose took notice. Nonetheless, the former provost told CCT
that critics might be focusing too narrowly on one aspect
of his From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural
Life (HarperCollins, $36), which actually grapples with
myriad developments within Western history. In this excerpt,
which the author suggested, he recounts a neglected scholarly
expedition in the midst of the Napoleonic Wars.
It
is not surprising — but it is shameful — that an unprecedented
enterprise by occidentals that was mighty in size and in cultural
consequences has remained virtually unknown to the educated
in the western world. Most histories and biographies, if they
mention it at all, give it a few lines that associate it with
Bonaparte’s military failure and not with his cultural success.
The subject that has been ignored is the expedition of French
scholars, scientists, and artists to Egypt in the year 1798.
It is a forgotten troop indeed: 167 men of high qualifications,
plucked from schools, studios, and laboratories, pursuant
to the order of the French government and led by General Bonaparte.
The original idea was Talleyrand’s.
The
government, Bonaparte, and the savants (as the group was called
by the accompanying Army of the Orient) each had a different
purpose in mind. The government (the short-lived Directory)
wanted to hold at a distance the young general whose victories
in Italy had made him popular. Bonaparte thought that glory
beckoned to him as the founder of an empire in the East: if
he won India, England would be weakened and he could be a
second Alexander. The path was through Egypt. As for the savants,
what they wanted was new knowledge and possibly adventure.
Their
average age was 25. The oldest, the mathematician Monge, whom
Bonaparte had befriended, was twice that age, and he shared
with his friend Berthollet, a chemist, the lead in most operations.
The youngest, not quite 15, was one of a half dozen students
from the Polytechnic School, with as many again of its faculty
and 33 of its alumni. The rest were: physicists, chemists,
engineers, botanists and zoologists, geologists, physicians
and pharmacologists, architects, painters, poets, musicians
(one of them a musicologist), and a master printer on the
supporting staff. Of those invited only two scientists and
four artists refused, pleading age and family obligations.
Many tried to be taken on, though not one among the 167 (or
in the army) knew where “in the Orient” the group was bound
for. Secrecy until the landing itself was imperative: Nelson
with the English fleet patrolled the Mediterranean....
The
organization was splendidly encyclopedic. Besides an amount
of supplies and equipment that could have set up a town, the
ships carried the scientific instruments used in each of the
mechanical arts and the sciences; two whole printing presses
with Greek, Arabic, and other fonts, materials for writing,
drawing, and painting; and 500 works of reference. In May
1798, Toulon harbor was a forest of masts: 15 ships of the
line, a dozen frigates, plus brigs, avisos, tartans — in all
300 vessels, to be joined in Corsica by three other convoys,
to transport 38,000 troops and 10,000 civilians. The army
numbered more officers than usual, especially generals.
Of
the savants, those who were graded as “generals” included
authorities such as Dolomieu (the geologist for whom the Dolomite
mountains were later named), Fourier (physicist and mathematician),
Conté (chemist), Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire (zoologist), Quesnot
(astronomer), Larrey and Desgenette (physicians), Lancret
(surgeon), Le Père (engineer), Redouté (flower painter), Villoteau
(musician). There were two pairs of brothers and one of father
and son. No Egyptologist on the outgoing trip, many returning.
The
repeated, painful vicissitudes of the journey were many and
beyond full recording. For the savants the trip meant roughing
it. The soldiers resented them and showed their contempt;
the generals did not. The armada escaped Nelson and captured
Malta without trouble, Bonaparte showed there his ability
to rule and reform. He abolished slavery and overhauled the
administration, finances, and educational system. Landing
in Egypt — for now all knew their destination — was another
thing altogether. Nelson ventured into the safe haven where
the French fleet lay and sank several ships with loss of soldiers
and sailors but not of savants.
From
this moment on, the learned corps was repeatedly exposed to
pitched battles and violent native revolts. Possibly worse
was the torture of the many long treks through the desert
in various directions, with fatigue, thirst, sunstroke, sand
blindness, and the jibes of the soldiery as the price of scientific
findings and amazing discoveries. Not the least of these,
for the historian, is that these men, freshly out of their
laboratories and studios and classrooms, turned themselves
overnight into soldiers on the firing line, builders of fortified
places, governors of occupied villages, excavators of ruins,
and makers of machinery with unfamiliar materials. The savants’
courage was equaled only by their versatility. Conté, a chemist
and a painter, invented a new kind of pump, made pencils without
graphite, improved the gears of water mills, and found a way
to reproduce color drawings — this, 10 years before lithography
— all of it in response to Egyptian predicaments. Nectoux,
a botanist, studied the agriculture and habits of the fellahin,
the native peasants. The mathematician Monge worked out the
peculiar hydraulics of Moses’ Fountain. Le Père, an army engineer,
built a stairway and terrace for the palace that Bonaparte
appropriated as his headquarters. Fourier shuttled between
differential equations and presiding at trials in an improvised,
necessary court. Marcel, an Arabist, became the publisher
of the journal issued every ten days, which contained the
reports of the learned at intervals and, more frequently,
news for the troops. The surgeon Larrey took anthropological
notes on the mixed population — Egyptian, Turk, Armenian,
Greek, Jewish, and Bedouin. When mummies were found he studied
embalming. At the onset of bubonic plague and typhoid the
astronomers turned meteorologists to help the physicians predict
wind and weather. Science conquers all.
So
it went. The official program of the expedition was: (1) To
study all of Egypt; (2) to spread enlightened ideas and habits;
and (3) to furnish the government any information it might
require. Duties 1 and 3 were abundantly fulfilled and 2 moderately
so. The native population was not at all impressed by the
machines and techniques. What they marveled at was that so
many foreigners studied Arabic and dashed about the desert
for silly reasons. The people of Cairo, the capital numbering
200,000 inhabitants, submitted to having the main streets
swept twice a day and the garbage removed. They were shocked
by the women’s unveiled faces, a little less by having their
own appearance sketched in pencil, but horrified when color
was applied to the portrait, which made it an aid to witchcraft.
On
their side, the westerners were delighted by the sights, the
mode of life, and the people, whom after a few months they
came to think of as French. This has been a (very un-English)
characteristic of the French colonists everywhere. In Egypt
they tolerated all but the unsanitary practices, they took
native mistresses (one general married a Muslim wife and was
converted), and they studied native mores without condescension.
Villoteau the musician was at first repelled by the several
musics of the different peoples; he came to enjoy and distinguish
their merits and share the emotions they were meant to arouse.
In the survey of diseases the physician Desgenette told his
aides to pay close attention to popular medicine — “superstitions
may teach us something useful.” Except for this last piece
of wisdom, the performance and the attitudes of the corps
of savants could be called the Enlightenment in action....
To
give an adequate idea of what this brain trust, the first
and largest of its kind, achieved in 20 months is impossible
in a few pages or yet a book. The Description of Egypt
fills 20 volumes of mega-elephant size — approximately
54 inches by 28.... Egypt was mapped in 47 plates. Publication,
begun after the return to France, was laborious and took a
quarter century The royalties were to benefit the authors,
most of whom were then by current standards old men, and not
a few were dead. There had been only a handful of casualties
during the expedition, the most damaging being the assassination
of General Kleber after he had succeeded Bonaparte as chief.
On
the joint epitaph of the 167, so to speak, one could inscribe
the following items. They gathered all the fauna and flora
within reach, found new species, filled gaps in the known
ones. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire was the indefatigable searcher
and his collection of fishes and mammals played a decisive
part in forming his ideas of evolution and those of Lamarck
after him. In chemistry, geology, geography, and mathematics,
a number of important advances were made, thanks to new facts
supplied by the Egyptian environment. To give but one example,
Berthollet proved wrong the notion of affinity in chemistry
by studying sodium and magnesium carbonates which are found
ready made in Egypt, and he proposed a better hypothesis.
The ancient civilization of Egypt was laid open for further
study. At first, the explorers reared on Greco-Roman sights
found barbaric the Sphinx and the Pyramids, but the Valley
of the Kings, the sarcophagi, the mummies — one with a papyrus
in her hand — the bas reliefs, the zodiac on the temple ceiling,
won their unreserved admiration. They measured, made architectural
plans, and inferred history and religion from the vestiges.
The unresting pencil of Vivant Denon drew everything and everybody,
alive or dead, and the panels of hieroglyphics besides.
When
the big block of black granite was found at Rosetta, where
the soldiers were clearing the ground for defensive earthworks
and where that stone had no reason to be, the savants’ jubilation
was at its height: it bore three texts, one in hieroglyphics,
one in demotic (Egyptian cursive for common use), and one
in Greek; it promised the decipherment of the Egyptian language.
This was done 20 years later by the independent but combined
work of two stay-at-homes named Champollion and Thomas Young.
In the Description volume, the picture of the stone is life
size. In the British Museum, where the stone reposes, the
caption reads: “Captured by the British Army (1801),” which
is literally correct. Adding “from the retreating French army
in Egypt” would fit the facts still better.
From
FROM DAWN TO DECADENCE by Jacques Barzun. Copyright
© 2000 by Jacques Barzun. Used by permission of HarperCollins
Publishers.
| |
|
1 | 2 | 3
| |
|
|